Primary endocrine therapy without surgery in older patients

Recommendation

Primary endocrine therapy without surgery in older patients

Primary endocrine therapy (endocrine therapy alone without surgery) should only be offered to older patients with ER-positive tumours who have a short-estimated life expectancy (<2–3 years), who are considered unfit for surgery after optimisation of comorbid medical conditions, or who decline surgery. The involvement of a geriatrician is strongly recommended to estimate life expectancy and guide management of reversible comorbidities. It is reasonable to choose tamoxifen, or an aromatase inhibitor based on potential side-effects.

 

How this guidance was developed

This recommendation was adopted from the SIOG/EUSOMA 2012 guidelines on the management of elderly patients with breast cancer (Europe). The source recommendation was based on a systematic review of the evidence conducted to June 2010 and was not graded by the source guideline authors. The source recommendation was accepted with minor stylistic changes, but with no changes to the meaning or tone of the source recommendation.

 

Primary endocrine therapy without surgery in older patients

Recommendation

Primary endocrine therapy (endocrine therapy alone without surgery) should only be offered to older patients with ER-positive tumours who have a short-estimated life expectancy (<2–3 years), who are considered unfit for surgery after optimisation of comorbid medical conditions, or who decline surgery. The involvement of a geriatrician is strongly recommended to estimate life expectancy and guide management of reversible comorbidities. It is reasonable to choose tamoxifen, or an aromatase inhibitor based on potential side-effects.

 

Principles in action
Image
Patient-centred care
Image
Safe and quality care
Image
Multidisciplinary care
Image
Communication

This recommendation was adopted from the SIOG/EUSOMA 2012 guidelines on the management of elderly patients with breast cancer (Europe). The source recommendation was based on a systematic review of the evidence conducted to June 2010 and was not graded by the source guideline authors. The source recommendation was accepted with minor stylistic changes, but with no changes to the meaning or tone of the source recommendation.